
New Executive Compensation Rules For Recipients Of TARP Funds – Which Parts Have Immediate Effect?
The expert attorneys at Verrill Dana, a premier law firm located in Portland, ME and with offices in Boston, MA, Hartford, CT and Washington D.C. have published the following article about the implications of the new compensation rules for recipients of TARP Funds.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), signed into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009, subjects all companies that receive federal funding under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”) to new rules governing executive compensation practices. Generally, the relevant restrictions will apply for so long as the particular company continues to have any obligations arising from financial assistance provided under TARP. Virtually all TARP recipients will need to reexamine their executive compensation programs and practices as a result of these new requirements.
ARRA requires the U.S. Department of the Treasury to promulgate regulations to require TARP recipients to meet appropriate standards for executive compensation and corporate governance. Those rules will obviously affect the design of compensation changes that TARP recipients ultimately make. In some important respects, however, ARRA arguably has immediate effect. In particular:
* TARP recipients should seek specific legal advice before paying any form of severance bonus to any of the top 5 executive officers or any of the next 5 most highly-compensated employees. ARRA calls for a prohibition against “golden parachute” payments to such individuals, and defines “golden parachute payment” very broadly to include “any payment to a senior executive officer for departure from a company for any reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued” (emphasis added). Contracts with Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program originally prohibited golden parachute arrangements exceeding three times the executive’s base compensation. ARRA can be read to be self-executing. On February 4, 2009 (before ARRA), Treasury had published rules further restricting the amount to one times base compensation, but only for companies receiving “exceptional assistance” under TARP. ARRA’s requirement of an outright prohibition could conceivably be given retroactive effect, but in the meantime many interpretational questions remain, such as: Will this restriction reach post-termination consulting or noncompetition payments? May TARP recipients devise restricted stock awards to take the place of severance payments?
* TARP recipients should seek specific legal advice before paying or accruing incentive compensation to its top earners. ARRA calls for a prohibition against accruing or paying any “bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation” to top-tier employees, other than in the form of long-term restricted stock grants valued at no More Than one-third of the employee’s annual compensation. In this case, the number of employees covered depends upon the amount of TARP funds provided to the company. If the company received less than $25 million, this restriction applies only to the single most highly-compensated employee. If the company received $25 million to $250 million, the restriction reaches at least the 5 most highly-compensated employees; if it received $250 million to $500 million, at least the top 5 executives plus the 10 next most highly-compensation employees; and if $500 million or more, at least the top 5 executives plus the 20 next most highly-compensated employees. Except in the under-$25 million category, ARRA gives Treasury authority to specify a greater number of covered employees. TARP recipients that pay bonuses in installments throughout the year may wish to examine whether to substitute long-term restricted stock grants – the one form of bonus compensation permitted to covered executives under this particular provision of ARRA.
* In structuring bonus compensation for 2009, TARP recipients should seek specific legal advice on whether the bonus should be made subject to a clawback provision. ARRA requires Treasury to provide for recovery of any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation to any of its top 5 executives or any of the next 20 highest-paid employees if paid on the basis of “earnings, revenues, gains, or other criteria” that are later found to be “materially inaccurate.” Because the scope and timing of these requirements is presently uncertain, TARP recipients should consider making the payments recoverable by contract where necessary or advisable to assure company compliance.
* Nonpublic TARP recipients should seek specific legal advice on whether to include a “say on pay” resolution at this year’s annual meeting of shareholders. As has been well-publicized, the Securities and Exchange Commission published guidance to the effect that public companies that are TARP recipients must include “say on pay” proposals in any annual meeting proxy statement filed with the Commission after February 17, 2009. It is far from clear whether a say on pay requirement should be read to apply immediately to nonpublic companies, and despite numerous inquiries, neither Treasury nor any federal banking regulators have yet published advice on this question. In the absence of such guidance, nonpublic companies are left to guess about the scope of disclosures that they would be required to make to their shareholders. Nonpublic companies are not subject to the SEC rules referenced by ARRA, and the SEC staff has, understandably, disclaimed responsibility for or jurisdiction over the disclosure or governance practices of these nonpublic companies.
If you have any further questions, please contact Verrill Dana directly at 207-623-3889
About the Author
Raw Food RECIPIES – BANANA DELIGHT & NORI WRAP
|
|
Hamilton Beach Digital Steamer $29.88 Product Description: Satisfying many different tastes at dinnertime is easy with this versatile Food Steamer. It has two separate steaming tiers with a removable divider to fit (almost) anything. Product Details: Cook in one or two tiers at once, or remove the tier divider for large foods Perfect for steaming corn on the cob or a head of broccoli Steams delicate fish, lobster & shrimp Cooks eggs … |
|
|
Sunbeam 5891 2-Pound Programmable Breadmaker, White $86.05 2 LB LOAF13-HOUR DELAY BAKE;12 COOKING FUNCTIONSEXPRESSBAKE BREAD MAKER CYCLE BAKES IN UNDER 1 HOURLED DISPLAYEASY-CLEAN TOUCH CONTROL PANELNON-STICK REMOVABLE BAKING PANINCLUDES INSTRUCTION BOOK WITH BREAD RECIPESUPC : 027045651783Shipping Dimensions : 18.30in X 14.00in X 13.40inEstimated Shipping Weight : 20.6812… |
|
|
Margaritaville DM0500 Bahamas 36-Ounce Frozen-Concoction Maker $229.99 FoodSaver Margaritaville Frozen Concoction Maker Bahamas, Bahamas Frozen Concoction Maker The Bahamas Margaritaville Frozen Concoction Maker is the right party enhancer for your next “spur of the moment” party! At the touch of a button, the Shave-N-Blend control automatically makes a picture-perfect 36 ounces of margaritas in one easy step. The Bahamas Frozen Concoction Maker allows you to “sha… |
|
|
Recipe for Hate $5.82 14 tracks. Light scuffs on outside edge of disc will not affect play…. |
|
|
Recycled Recipes $4.98 All products are BRAND NEW and factory sealed. Fast shipping and 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed…. |
|
|
Unilluminated $12.00 … |
|
|
World Academy of Soccer Coaching Skills: The Official Video For the USSF D, E and F Licensing Courses … |
|
|
Rich Diesslin KNOTS Scout Cartoons – Famous Scout Recipies – Cooking Like a Master Chef – Light Switch Covers – 2 plug outlet cover $13.95 Famous Scout Recipies – Cooking Like a Master Chef Light Switch Cover is new and handcrafted utilizing unique process resulting in a stunning high gloss ceramic-like finish. SET OF MATCHING SCREWS IS INCLUDED giving it a perfect finishing touch. Made of durable metal material…. |
Related Articles
No user responded in this post
Leave A Reply